data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eec4f/eec4f935aac307255c52ed78dff802a1a25fe7d0" alt="Ldplayer vs bluestacks performance"
If you have any question, I'll gladly answer them. Probably not the best indicator, but I didn't found a better one. To see which one is the best overall I've multiplied the average RAM and the average CPU together. On the other hand, Nox Player came in second with a benchmark score of 121,400. BlueStacks scored a total score of 165,000 on the Antutu Benchmark Testing. I measured the RAM and CPU usage of each emulators every seconds and then calculated the average for both. Check the video below for the benchmark testing procedure. LDPlayer registered a massive 145 higher CPU usage. Each benchmark took about 500 seconds (approx. BlueStacks 5 outshined all the emulators, consuming about 10 CPU. While we know about 74 links to BlueStacks, weve tracked only 6 mentions of. I ran the benchmark with Girls Frontline, doing 3 runs of the same level using the same team. Based on our record, BlueStacks seems to be a lot more popular than.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da07c/da07c8a0acde9a4260ffc082ae75acab1d04eed8" alt="ldplayer vs bluestacks performance ldplayer vs bluestacks performance"
I have always wondered which emulators run the best and I haven't found a single article talking about the performance of the emulators, so I decided to test them myself. LDPlayer is always updating and you will get updates from time to time. This test does not take into account potential malicious files installed by the emulator and extra features like key mapping or 60fps mode.Įmulators tested: Nox, Bluestack, Leapdroid, LDplayer, Memu
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eec4f/eec4f935aac307255c52ed78dff802a1a25fe7d0" alt="Ldplayer vs bluestacks performance"